I just finished reading The Score, which is #5 in the Parker
series by Richard Stark. I’ve been reading them in the order they were written,
although I’m not sure that’s really important.
I did not grow up reading crime fiction, other than John D. MacDonald’s
work. So I was very late discovering the Parker novels. I had certainly heard
quite a bit of good stuff about them before I ever tried one, but it wasn’t
until November 2014 that I got to the first one in the series. I was bowled over by that book, The Hunter,
and immediately bought the next 12 or so in the series. Here are my reviews of the first five books:
The
Hunter: (4 stars). I had never read anything by Richard Stark, or by Donald
Westlake, which is the author's real name. The Stark books feature a character
named Parker, who is generally described as a thief, although he certainly does
plenty of killing too. This is the first one in that series and there are at
least 23 more. This one has been filmed at least twice that I know of. I
enjoyed this one a lot and am irritated at myself for waiting so long to read
one. I'd been hearing good things about them for years.
What we are looking at with this
book is a stripped down, noir tale. No wasted motion, no wasted words, no
wasted description. This makes it a quick read. I didn't quite get through it
in one sitting but came close.
I like books
with rich, sensuous description, but this one doesn't have any of that and I
liked it too. I suspect that I wouldn't want to read three or four of them back
to back, but it's a quick, hard hitting work that you can mix in among other,
perhaps more leisurely, reads.
The
Man with the Getaway Face: (4 stars). This is the second in the Parker
series. Not quite as compelling as the first to me, but still very good. Parker
is a real SOB in many ways and you don't necessarily root for him, but the
combination of the intensity of that character and the compelling plot line
keeps you turning the pages. I've just started the third in the series.
The
Outfit: (4 stars). Third in the Parker series. Parker went to all the trouble
to get a new face that was revealed in book 2, but finds by the end of that
book that his new appearance has been revealed anyway and the
"Outfit," (Organized Crime) is out to kill him. Parker strikes back
as only he can do. Good one!
The
Mourner: (3 stars). This is still a good read, but I liked it least of the
four Parker books I've finished so far. One reason is that Parker is actually
only on the scene for a little over half the book. Quite a bit of the book
follows another guy named Menlo, who has betrayed Parker. Still, it was a
quick, enjoyable read.
The
Score: (3 stars). This is the longest of the Parker books I’ve read so far
and I’d rank it about where I ranked #4, The
Mourner. It was good, but not as good as the first three. In this book, a
man comes to Parker and some colleagues with an idea for a huge score, one in
which they’ll essentially rob an entire town. Everything seems to be going well
when the fellow who initiated everything turns out to have a private agenda.
Hell breaks loose. I thought there were a few slow spots, particularly where
Parker’s crew is hiding out for a while. Parker also had less to do with the
resolution of the story than in the previous books. I still enjoyed it quite a
lot, however. And fortunately I have quite a few more of these books on my
shelves!
Sounds like my kind of books. I'll definitely check them out. Thanks for the reviews!
ReplyDeleteI am working my way through the Parker novels now..in the middle of The Mournera. I have mixed feelings about them; I'm a much bigger fan of Westlake's Dortmunder and Kelp series.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I think what stands out about these books is thr spareness in his writing. Nothing superlative here. Sometimes pacing suffers for Westlake' economy, but he makes up for it in some of thr twists and turns his plots take.
I am working my way through the Parker novels now..in the middle of The Mournera. I have mixed feelings about them; I'm a much bigger fan of Westlake's Dortmunder and Kelp series.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I think what stands out about these books is thr spareness in his writing. Nothing superlative here. Sometimes pacing suffers for Westlake' economy, but he makes up for it in some of thr twists and turns his plots take.
Aimlesswriter. good noir crime fiction
ReplyDeleteStewart, I'm not used to that sparseness so I am definitely enjoying it. at least in smaller doses.
Thanks for the reviews. I don't remember reading any of Westlake, but they sound like something I should have read years ago. I will probably never get to 'em.
ReplyDeleteI have read some Westlake but not the Parker novels. I have THE HUNTER. Maybe it's time to start.
ReplyDeleteThank you Charles
ReplyDeleteWarm ALOHA,
ComfortSpiral
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_('')
Is this series the basis for the recent Jason Statham movie? I rather liked the movie, and when I heard it was based on a book/books, I wondered if they were good.
ReplyDeleteI really like the Parker novels. I got the feeling that it turned into Westlake's exploration of plot. He started some in the middle and some near the end. I think he liked the formula of the heist novel and seeing what he could do inside of that formula.
ReplyDeleteOscar, quick reads
ReplyDeleteCloudia, glad you enjoyed
Toom Doolan, Yes, Statham played Parker in a fairly recent movie. Mel Gibson played him in a movie as well.
Dan Luft, sounds like a good analysis of them.
I am going to have a look at the 'Parker' series. Good review.
ReplyDeleteCharles, I have heard of Richard Stark and his Parker series. I will try and read some of these novels next year. I preferred the Gibson film over that of Jason Statham.
ReplyDeletePOINT BLANK with Lee Marvin, directed by John Boorman (1967), from THE HUNTER, is by far the best of the Parker movies. Charles, if you decide to read through the entire series and then want more, Max Allan Collins' two series about professional thief Nolan and hit man Quarry were inspired by Westlake and Parker.
ReplyDeleteBernard, I bet you'd like 'em
ReplyDeletePrashant, yes, I liked the Gibson better too.
Fred, I forgot about the Lee Marvin film. I've never seen it. Will have to give it a look. Thanks for the heads up on Collins as well
Cool. I like this idea especially: "hard hitting work that you can mix in among other, perhaps more leisurely, reads. . ." Sounds a little like the "Riplead" with Tom Ripley. Believe it or not!
ReplyDeletehello Charles, love your new template, real men wear black, haha, I have a new blog, well again, our voice just evolves into age
ReplyDeleteErik, it works best for me to mix various kinds of reads.
ReplyDeleteLisa, I will check it out. Thanks for dropping by
Have not read any Stark yet, altho I've been reading enthusiastic reviews of his work on Ed Gorman's blog. And now yours. I most look into this dude!
ReplyDelete[Lordy, I flunked the first Captcha test--misidentified a palm tree. I'll bet even a robot would've gotten that one.]
Oops, forgot to check email follow...
ReplyDeleteCharles-I will be recommending these books to my brother!
ReplyDelete